Intro: "Thousands of protesters, including a Nobel laureate and a movie star, gathered near the White House on Sunday in opposition to TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline."
Demonstrators protesting the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline march around the White House, 11/06/11. (photo: Evan Vucci/AP)
10,000 Surround White House in XL Pipeline Protest
06 November 11
housands of protesters, including a Nobel laureate and a movie star, gathered near the White House on Sunday in opposition to TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline.
The demonstration is the latest in a series of White House protests aimed at convincing US President Barack Obama to block the $7 billion project that would carry Alberta oilsands crude through six American states to Gulf Coast refineries.
Mark Ruffalo, nominated for an Academy Award last year, and Jody Williams, winner of the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize for her work on banning landmines, were among the celebrities who intended to join hands and encircle the White House despite the fact that Obama was golfing in northern Virginia on a stunning autumn afternoon.
"I'm here to get a message to President Obama to stop the tarsands, Keystone XL pipeline," Ruffalo told The Canadian Press.
"I voted for him because he promised us change and he promised us we were going to be the generation to end tyranny, and now is his chance to come through."
Canadian actress Margot Kidder, arrested at a summer White House anti-Keystone protest, was back on Sunday amid thousands of peaceful protesters who waved banners and chanted anti-pipeline slogans across Pennsylvania Avenue from the presidential residence.
"I have heard he's gone golfing but he has to drive through the wonderful circle to get back to his house, so that's perfect," she said.
The Obama administration is currently weighing whether to give the green light to Keystone XL.
The US State Department is making the ruling because the pipeline crosses an international border, but the president has said the final decision will reflect his views and suggested he isn't swayed by the argument that the pipeline will create jobs.
"Folks in Nebraska, like all across the country, aren't going to say to themselves, 'We'll take a few thousand jobs if it means our kids are potentially drinking water that would damage their health,"' Obama said in an interview with an Omaha TV station.
"We don't want, for example, aquifers to be adversely affected. Folks in Nebraska obviously would be directly impacted."
A decision on the pipeline was supposed to be made by the end of the year, but the State Department suggested last week that it might defer the decision as they continue to assess whether Keystone XL is in the national interest of the United States.
Keystone XL has become a political hot potato for the Obama administration, especially since the release of emails that suggest a cosy relationship between State Department officials and TransCanada's chief lobbyist, Paul Elliott.
Elliott worked on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's unsuccessful presidential bid in 2008.
There have also been allegations that the State Department failed to do an impartial environmental assessment of Keystone XL by hiring an environmental consulting firm, Houston-based Cardno Entrix, recommended to it by TransCanada itself.
With a presidential election less than a year away, key Obama advisers are reportedly growing increasingly nervous about losing supporters if they approve Keystone XL.
The pipeline's opponents point to a series of recent spills along oil pipelines and argue the Keystone XL project is a disaster waiting to happen as it would carry millions of barrels a week of carbon-intensive oilsands crude through environmentally fragile areas of the US Great Plains.
Proponents, meantime, say the pipeline will create thousands of much-needed jobs and help end American reliance on oil from volatile and sometime hostile OPEC regimes.
The project has not only become a symbol of the increasingly heated debate in the United States about the country's reliance on fossil fuels and a perceived reluctance to embrace renewable sources of energy, but also the distrust many Americans feel towards big corporations.
Pipeline opponents have said their anti-Keystone protests reflect larger scale public anger at corporate greed, pointing to the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations.
"You can't occupy the White House, but you can surround it," Bill McKibben, a leading US environmentalist and one of the protest's organizers, told a news conference last week.
Keystone XL has become a flashpoint for the environmental movement in the US following last year's failed federal climate change legislation. More than 1,000 protesters were arrested this summer in two weeks of sit-ins outside the White House.
The Nebraska legislature, meantime, is in special session considering legislation that could force TransCanada to reroute the pipeline away from the Ogallala Aquifer, a major source of drinking water for the region.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |












Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
This proposed pipeline is one more smells-to-high-heaven government/private enterprise romp over the people and the environment with no thought toward the future of anyone's grandchildren. To hell with the planet we are leaving for them. Profit Before People is the battle cry of the Republican Party, and battle seems to be all they know. Unbelievable and shameful.
Does anyone still HOPE there will be a CHANGE?
We ALL hope. That is why we are here and why there is a Reader Supported News in the first place.
Hope is foundationary to ALL Spiritual yearnings.
As well they should be. This is NOT the "change" Obama promised or that we voted for!!
Obama should not approve the pipeline because it is the right thing to do, for all the reasons stated by others commenting on the protests at the White House. He most certainly will lose supporters if he makes the wrong decision.
Answer - To Texas.
And who do you think it will benefit?
Answer: The Koch brothers.
And if it is approved, who will be selling us out?
Answer: Our President
DISGUSTING!
The joke is nearly Vaudevillian!
Change we can believe in? He needs to hear that again and again until he stops this thing.
OCCUPY IT..!
TAKE IT BACK AND LITERALLY SAVE THE WORLD AND MANKIND..!
Corporate Greed and the Greedy Self Serving Politicians in their pockets are destroying everything--- Our System of Government.., Our Country.., Our Economy.. Our Environment--> The entire Global System, The Entire Ecosystem all the way down the very Planet we live on.
THEY HAVE EVEN GUNKED UP OUTTER SPACE ALREADY AND CHANGED THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE VERY AIR WE BREATH EVERYWHERE IN THE WORLD..!
And all because its ''''Profitable'''' for THEM..!
The refineries have said that they will use tarsands oil primarily to produce diesel for shipment overseas, not for use in the US. The proponents lie.
Canada. My home state is Nebraska. This pipeline will ruin the
beautiful rolling green Sandhills of Nebraska. It goes near my hometown and also my husband's hometown. It goes by and over
millions of people's drinking water from the amazing Ogallala
aquifier. Save this wonderful water source for people to drink.
One spill could be devastating. STOP THIS NOW! Nebraskans
are resilient and strong but small in numbers. When Memorial Football stadium fills up each Saturday to watch the Cornhuskers, it is the 3rd largest city in the state---my hometown has 2200 people and is dwindling. The few jobs this might possibly provide do not outweigh the need for clean
drinking water as well as being a good steward for this fertile land. Oil spill---ugly---we lose drinking water AND farmland to grow food.
Go CORNHUSKER STATE! And, if your crappy republican in Democratic clothing votes for this (i.e. Ben Nelsen)--FIRE THE
MORON!!!! He must truly love profits above his state. Shame. Shame. Shame.
Bernie Sanders for President!
I would agree with you, brianf, except for two facts: one, Bernie has stated clearly that he has no interest in running for president, and two, a third-party candidate wouldn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning in 2012. This is not the way I want it to be, but it is the way things are right now, so we have to face reality. If OWS can hold it together and continue to grow, I think the story might be very different by 2016. But in 2012, a vote for a third party candidate would be the same as a vote for a RepubliPIG -- it would just split the Dem vote and hand the election to them. And quite honestly, if we think things are bad under Obama, putting in a total Rep government would be exponentially worse. I suspect we have no idea just how bad things could get under those conditions!
RSS feed for comments to this post.