Obama to Nominate Jesus Christ to Supreme Court
Pick Jesus art photo, 06/15/09. (photo: Bill Steber)
This article was originally credited to Rick Chertoff, who we have since found is not the author. We apologize for the error.
resident Barack Obama is expected to nominate Jesus Christ, an immigrant originally born to a virgin mother in Bethlehem, to fill the new vacancy on the Supreme Court. Although Mr. Christ is over 2,000 years old, He is immortal, so Democrats and Republicans expect that He will serve on the high court forever or until He decides to start the End Times. Republicans are expected to fight the nomination on the grounds that Mr. Christ would radically move the Court to the left. The GOP is also concerned that, despite decades of controversy and speculation, Mr. Christ has never revealed his position on abortion. Mr. Christ, according to many authorities, is expected to oppose the death penalty in all forms. Michael Steele, the head of the GOP national committee, issued a statement: "Christ is a complete mystery to us. He won't reveal His physical appearance and many of His positions are unknown or the subject of speculation. He is a stealth candidate. Why won't He reveal himself? Who does He think He is?"
Republicans are reportedly outraged that Mr. Obama even considered Mr. Christ, who has been widely quoted for his sentiments supporting the poor over the wealthy. In a Facebook post, former half-term Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin called for an investigation into the Bethlehem chapter of ACORN because of what she termed the "highly suspicious" coincidence that both President Obama and Mr. Christ had each spent three years as community organizers. In her post, Palin also wrote that "More and more of good God-fearing smalltime Americans from hardworking smalltime towns from great parts of this real America, West, South, East, North, are seeing more and more every day that Christ is a community organizer. We don't need another community organizer in the White House!"
Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) asked, "We're not even sure where He was born. Why is He afraid to show us his birth certificate?" Bachmann also announced that she would vote "no" when the Christ nomination came before the House of Representatives. Later, her congressional staff released a statement saying that the Congresswoman had forgotten that the House does not vote on judicial nominations.
According to Rush Limbaugh, "Christ doesn't know anything about free enterprise. This is part of the Obama conspiracy to drag us to socialism. If this guy is approved, I'm moving to Costa Rica." Sobbing, Glenn Beck attacked Christ's support for the separation of church and state, telling his audience "You know who else wanted a separation of church and state? Hitler."
Several Catholic priests were contacted for comment but refused to discuss the issue, and, even though they weren't asked, all empathetically denied that they had personally molested any children.
Democrats are optimistic about their chances of shoving Mr. Christ down the throats of Americans using normal constitutional and parliamentary procedures. Many Democrats are hopeful that Mr. Christ's past associations with prostitutes will earn him at least one Republican vote, that of Sen. David Vitter (R-LA).
If confirmed, Christ will be the first Supreme Court Justice who has at least one American city named after him: Corpus Christi, Texas.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |










Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
.
thanks for the "lightness of some political humor".
How phucking true.
DS
You have made my day.
You are in trouble, you know?
I'd bet if Licoln was somehow ressurected he would be found unaccpetable by the GOP as being entirely to liberal for their taste.
Maybe Reagan would be acceptable but Reagan lacked any intellectual credentials and would be rejected by the bar association as a scofflaw with no experience in legal affairs.
jUSTmEE
I'm afraid I have to disagree --the Republicans will feel duty-bound to oppose ANY nominee President Obama proposes. They don't have it in their genes to compromise. The Republican definition of "bipartisan" is "vote as we vote; do what we want --no compromises allowed."
It would be for the same reasons that the Democrats and Obama didn’t put up a single payer medical bill to begin with in the health care debate.
Because the Democrat's and Obama's objectives are the same as the Republican's objectives.
Remember, both parties are bought and paid for by the same industries.
The challenge for Obama is to keep it looking like he is a progressive while advancing the policies of the lobbyists or donors.
As long as the public will buy Obama’s excuse of trying to be bi-partisan, he will continue to be a corporatist.
Yours is funnier, mine was serious. Read Chapter 5 in THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV in which Jesus returns during the Inquisition Jesus and is threatened with death by the chief inquisitor a 90 year old Cardinal, who eventually releases Jesus, however, then banished him from Planet Earth.
It is not the constitutional intent that the judges of the supreme court 'make' law; it is to faithfully honor their oath to God to preserve and protect the Constitution.
I don't disagree with the substance of what you say, but please read the frigging Constitution and the laws and decisions that have followed before embarrassing yourself by trying to insinuate your religious beliefs into the issue. That oath MAY be made BEFORE God (or Krishna, or Buddha, etc.), or it may simply be an affirmation, but it is an oath of one's personal honor made TO the people of the United States. There is no religious test to hold office in the U.S. --yet, at least.
Supposedly, but 4 of the 5 cons ALWAYS rule based on ideology, not the constitution. On occasion Kennedy upholds the actual constitution.
Besides, I heard "Jesus" was alive and well in Juarez, Mexico. He was seen driving a taxi cab!
TRY ASSUMING HE IS NOT A WIMP, THEN WHY MIGHT HE SELECT A JUDGE THAT IS TRULY MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD BUT NOT A LIBERAL? COULD IT BE THAT HIS SELECTION WILL BE TO MAKE SURE HE DOESN’T OFFEND DEMOCRATIC DONORS? ANY THOUGHTS ASSUMING HE IS NOT MAKING DECISIONS BECAUSE HE IS A WIMP.
I WILL TRY ONE MORE TIME TO GET YOU AND OTHERS TO IMAGINE JUST FOR THE MOMENT THAT THE DEMS DIDN’T CAVE IN AND THERE ARE NO WIMPS IN THE CONGRESS. WITH THAT EXCUSE GONE, WHAT ELSE COULD BE THE CAUSE OF THE DEMOCRATS ACTIONS?
ONE POSSIBILITY FROM YOUR EXAMPLE OF THE NUCLEAR OPTION, REPEAL OF THE FILIBUSTER TO PREVENT THE DEMS FROM BLOCKING HIS 2 NOMINATIONS TO THE SUPREME COURT AND THE DEMS CAVED IN.
COULD THIS ISSUE HAVE BEEN DECIDED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS BY BOTH PARTIES IN ORDER TO GET THE JUSTICES THAT THE CORPORATIONS WANTED WHILE KEEPING IT LOOKING LIKE IT THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PARITIES?
Yes, it is conjecture. But, if I am correct it may not be as hard to pull off working together as you imagine.
Assume you had given each of the two parities millions and you have lobbyists befriending each politician and you now have legislation you want passed. Would you not call representatives from both parties and talk to them about how we can get this done. I think you would. From there on it would become a part staged part ad-lib performance. If you remember the major media is owned by like minded corporatist the they will facilitate the passage of the bill while pretending to be an unbiased observer.
You are correct this is all conjecture but to me it is a more believable scenario than believing that the Democrats are stupid, whiny wimps.
please let me assure you that he has. If he has not revealed Himself to you, perhaps you haven't yet accepted that it is possible to experience the Presence of Jesus. Just be open and willing and I trust that sooner or later you will be Graced by His Presence.
1.Barack Obama doesn't believe in Jesus
2.Barack Obama thinks he IS Jesus
3.Jesus would forgive anyone, guilty or not.
4.Jesus would never agree to wear a black robe.
Your statement is an indication that you have not read the Constitution or the Bill of Right. It is also an indication that you have not read the Bible. Jesus is for the poor, it was him that kick the money lenders out of the church.
As for the constitution, it IS beginning to unravel.....due to too many opportunists in BOTH political parties.
The biggest fools of all will be those people who voted Democratic in 2006 and 2008, but plan on voting Republican in November and in 2012 because they're steaming mad at Obama. That will be like cutting their noses off to spite their face.
So please describe the "Christ" in your Bible --is he one who favors the wealthy over the poor? Or maybe the one who favored theocracy? Or the one who advocated ignoring the least among us? Just how does this Christ differ from "your" Christ? Inquiring minds want to know.
What's "left" about it? is there one attribute of of the Christ described above that is not consistent with the Biblical accounts, or that that any Christian -left or right- should disavow?
“I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.” - Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906), U.S. reformer, suffragist
“Every man thinks God is on his side. The rich and powerful know he is.”
- Jean Anouilh, French dramatist, playwright
“You can safely assume you’ve created God in your own image when it turns out he hates all the same people you do.” -Anne Lamott, Author
that their Supreme Court nominee will have Christ like qualities
and the conservatives will disagree with these qualities. OK liberals,
put the crack pipes down. This is too much. The author of this article
should embarrassed for writing this trash.
http://bstrait.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/the-npr-interview-with-jesus/
You obviously delete all the stuff that says you haven't a clue who Jesus is.
All these comments sound like third grade communists wrote'em.
I'll just pray for ya!
RSS feed for comments to this post.