Share
Email This Page
add comment

Cap the Size of Wall Street's Big Banks

Print
Friday, 16 April 2010 17:10
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)


The Only Way to Prevent Another Bailout of Wall Street Is to Cap the Size of Wall Street's Big Banks

he best way for Senate Dems and the White House to respond to the Republican charge that the Dem plan for financial reform doesn't go far enough to prevent another bailout is to call their bluff - and simultaneously do what's necessary to avoid another bailout: Cap the size of big banks, as the UK is close to doing for its big banks.

The so-called "resolution" mechanism the Dems are pushing to wind down any big bank that gets into trouble is a step in the right direction. But it won't work if two or more giant banks are endangered at the same time - which is likely to be the case when the next crisis occurs because every big bank uses whatever profitable financial ploys every other bank uses (as they did in the runup to the crash of 2008).

Furthermore, as I've noted before, as long as the big banks are allowed to be huge and become even bigger, their political clout in Washington will remain huge and become even bigger. And as long as they have this kind of clout, they'll wangle a bailout from Washington the next time their bets get them into trouble regardless of any "resolution" authority.

So the Dem bill must cut the big banks down to size. The limit should be $100 billion in assets.

Banks complain that their global competitiveness will suffer if they're held to this size. Baloney. No one has been able to show any competitive efficiencies above $100 billion in assets. And for Wall Street to suggest its global competitiveness is somehow tied to the competitiveness of the rest of the American economy is the height of hubris anyway. Wall Street is making deals all over the world (i.e. Goldman Sachs and Greece), it's parking its money all over the world, its star employees reside all over the globe, and it invests wherever it can get the best deals all over the world.

The only competitive advantage to being a giant bank headquartered on Wall Street is to have the economic and political clout to get bailed out by American taxpayers when the next crisis hits. We have learned this once. We do not need to learn it again.

Repeat: The only sure way to ensure that no bank becomes too big to fail is to make sure no bank is too big.


Open Article On Originating Site


Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+4 # Guest 2010-04-16 23:30
This is also the conclusion reached in the excellent book "Thirteen Bankers" by Kwak and Simpson. It'll be a hell of a fight to get it done though.3v5k3
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-04-17 04:21
The obvious is hard to do in the
washington Bordello. Pimps and their crew of "Call Girls" rule the day.

You know this. When will you write a column saying so?
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-04-17 07:14
I think this is right on the mark. Another possible positive effect of cutting banks down to a manageable size, could be more competition for consumers to use their financial tools. In other words, better deals for the average folks. The behemoth financial institutions that currently rule the day, (And, apparently rule the world.) now have the power to monopolize the market, squashing competition from smaller banks, and credit unions. The big banks set the terms, interest rates, and everything else, and the smaller competition is forced to follow the industry lead. Besides bringing the greedy bastards back to earth, and reality, by making them smaller, we need to re-enact true financial reform on exotic investment tools, sketchy mortgages to those that can't afford them, and put a halt to whatever other financial fantasies these investment firms invent out of whole cloth.
 
 
+1 # ProfPeteB 2010-04-17 08:06
We agree again. I would go several steps further:
1)-Nationalize all banks.
2)-Raise interest rates and mandate what ratio there should be nationally between interest earned and interest charged.
3)-Forbid banks to short in their investments, the markets into which they sell mortgages.

However, these are pipe-dreams because Obama is not FDR.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-04-18 11:27
Everything is a dream before it become reality, be it sooner, or later.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-04-17 09:53
Simply national the banking system. They have proven time and time again that they cannot be trusted.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-04-17 15:55
Finally somebody with a fifth grade education. It didn't take a "Think tank" at all.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-04-17 20:25
Nationalizing the banking system doesn't even take a fifth grade education to figure out and neither a think tank. What it takes is some courage and a willingness to do the right thing regardless of the immediate political cost to the President who dares to take this on. Presidential cowardice is what seperates the men from the boys. FDR had courage. Does Obama? To be honest, I really don't know but that's a problem for me. I'd like to think he did but I have no evidence that convinces me.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.