Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

Job Cre(m)ation And The Profit Motive

Print
by Thomas Magstadt   
Wednesday, 28 December 2011 22:29

My candidate for the biggest campaign lie of 2011 is one the see-saw Republican front-runner and default nominee Mitt Romney loves to repeat every time a reporter shoves a microphone in his wood-carving of a face: corporations are job creators. Neither the facts nor the logic of capitalism support this contention.

The facts: Big Business in America destroys jobs at home and creates jobs abroad. If you don't believe it, here's a story journalist David Wessel filed in April of this year (The Wall Street Journal, 4/19/2011):

"U.S. multinational corporations, the big brand-name companies that employ a fifth of all American workers, have been hiring abroad while cutting back at home, sharpening the debate over globalization's effect on the U.S. economy.

The companies cut their work forces in the U.S. by 2.9 million during the 2000s while increasing employment overseas by 2.4 million, new data from the U.S. Commerce Department show. That's a big switch from the 1990s, when they added jobs everywhere: 4.4 million in the U.S. and 2.7 million abroad.

In all, U.S. multinationals employed 21.1 million people at home in 2009 and 10.3 million..."

That's right, the "job creators" cut 2.9 million jobs in the first decade of the 21st century, while creating 2.4 million jobs overseas. Today, US companies employ almost half as many workers abroad as they do in the US. How's that for job creation!

This year, Merck and Co., one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, announced plans to "cremate" 13,000 jobs by the end of 2015. About 40 percent of the cremated jobs will be lost here in the U.S. Here are few more examples:

Company Layoffs

Borders 16,700
Cisco Systems 6,500
Lockheed Martin 6,500
Perkins and Marie Callender's Inc. 2,500
Medtronic 2,000

At the same time, governments at all levels are operating in the red and find themselves under heavy pressure from Republican demagogues and Tea Party Know-nothings, to cut deficits without raising taxes on anybody or anything for any reason. Thus the U.S. Postal has announced 7,500 job cuts, and several states including Connecticut (6,500), Alabama (2,000), and Iowa (2,000), are following suit.

Corporations don't just create jobs, they also destroy them. And the cremation is often done in a way that's disrespectful to the corpses and devastating to local economies: suddenly, ruthlessly, and without remorse.

The facts simply don't support the idea that giant corporations are great job creators. But it's not facts alone that prove the point and point to the fallacy of Republican and Chamber of Commerce propaganda about the "job creators". Logic and life itself points to the same conclusion: business exists to make a profit, not to do good in the world.

Business is not about charity or compassion. It's not about political stability, social justice, economic sustainability, or fair elections. It's about making money, for shareholders perhaps, but especially for the top management of giant corporations who are the new plutocrats, the super rich. The 1%.

To expect business to be troubled by things like poverty, homelessness, air pollution, water quality, climate change, a lack of affordable health insurance, marginal public schools or unsafe neighborhoods is foolish.

In one of his rare utterances as president, Calvin Coolidge declared, "The business of America is business." He was wrong. The business of business is business. What Coolidge failed to say was that the business of government is to govern.
So blame Coolidge. Blame Washington. Blame Congress. And, yes, blame President Obama, who can't decide if he wants to be FDR or "Silent Cal".

It's the job of government to regulate business and banking in the interests of society. Blaming business for opposing state regulation or cutting labor costs or lobbying Congress for tax breaks is like shopping for fine wine at a Family Dollar store.

More than three years after the financial crisis that kicked off the Great Recession, Washington has done nothing to force financial reform. It is still business as usual for too-big-to-fail banks and the "risk management" industry. Meanwhile, foreclosures continue, major banks sit on mountains of cash reserves, and major corporations lay off workers by the thousands.

So it's a safe bet that US companies will continue to create jobs overseas where labor is cheap and abundant, health and safety standards are non-existent, and the EPA holds no sway. And that Washington will make no move to disincentivize this behavior.

A "commercial republic" - that's what James Madison called the system he was instrumental in creating. Ironically, America's blind faith in the power of commerce to make the world a better place now threatens the very survival of the republic.

 

Comments  

 
0 # tmagstadt 2011-12-29 09:57
A follow up: yesterday the NY Times ran a story about Morgan Stanley beginning the first round of layoffs that will total 1,600 when completed in the first quarter of 2012. Citigroup will cut 4,500 jobs. Bank of America and Goldman Sachs have announced upcoming layoffs, as well. These big banks, of course, were the chief beneficiaries of the multibillion dollar taxpayer-financed bailout. The top management these banks will not be cut, neither will the obscene salaries and other compensation (bonuses, stock options, et cetera)they all get. And the likely perpetrators of massive fraud and malfeasance whose alleged crimes led to the 2008 banking crisis will not be brought to trial.
 
 
+1 # RMDC 2011-12-29 11:02
Yes, this is good. Thanks. The idea that millionaires or billionaries are the "job creators" is really laughable. The fact that many people believe this and all republican candidates repeat it incessantly only shows how far we've gone in the direction of neo-liberalism, Chicago or Austrian economics.

The only real job creator is demand. When there are enough people wanting to buy something, someone will go to work making it. But this has nothing to say about who makes it or where it is made. That can only be addressed by protectionist legislation -- something governments in this era of the World Trade Organization will not do.
 
 
0 # tmagstadt 2011-12-29 18:14
Right on. Thanks for the comment!
 
 
+1 # edwin_ 2011-12-30 02:29
My experience has been, that as a degreed electrical engineer, I have been laid off 5 times . 3 have been directly attributed to the company hiring an h1b recipient to replace me. On two of the occasions I had to train my replacment. The market for engineers is not great so each time i'm laid off i'm on the streets for 6 months to a year looking for a job.

It just seem wrong to have workers from another contry come here to take an american job. I have worked in a few different countries as a specialized start-up ,service engineer and had to go through many hoop to get a work permit. The US hands out 50K+ per year and has lost count of the number.

Most of the time its a bean counter, with no technical skills, that wants to save $ even though the h1b worker is running at 50% effeciency. Most communicate poorly and are hard to understand

M
 
 
0 # tmagstadt 2011-12-30 09:08
Yes, and neither the mainstream news media nor our "leaders" in Congress ever talk about it in these terms. And they sure as h*** don't do anything about it. Which is why I think the only way to change things is to mount a massive grass-roots effort to vote incumbents out of office. There are a few exceptions, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont is one, but what's needed is a thorough "bipartisan" housecleaning on Capitol Hill.
 
 
+1 # edwin_ 2011-12-31 15:23
Mr Magstadt, I think that you are on to one of the main discontents of the OWS crowd. They know the system is rigged and may not sure how to articulate it. They see that the politicians allow the following :
-companies getting tax breaks or paying no taxes while sending jobs over seas.
- companies hiring H1B immigrants
- Minimun wage not keeping pace with inflation
_-more corporate welfare than we can list here But the $ go to the rich and not the workers.
The big $ politicans used t obe the Repugs but the Dems wanted a taste if the action so now there are only a few politicians that look after the workers.
Getting $ out of politic would help.

Thanks for the timely article
 
 
+1 # tmagstadt 2012-01-07 07:10
The redoubtable, Paul Krugman, a fine economist if ever there was one, just wrote a column on this subject. He argues that it's not fair to say that corporations don't create jobs, but that Republicans like Mitt Romney only talk about jobs in terms of addition. There's never any mention of subtraction. And the jobs that are subtracted tend to be good jobs, while the jobs that are added are low-paying menial jobs. What he doesn't say, however, is that workers aren't statistics and they aren't interchangeable parts. When a company owned by, say, Bain Capital, destroys 750 jobs as part of a bankruptcy action, those 750 workers lose everything. It's not like the capitalists responsible for the business failure find these same workers jobs elsewhere. In fact, what often happens is that even the workers' pension funds are not sound. So, if anything, Krugman is too kind. By the way, the above scenario is exactly what happened to workers (all 750 of 'em) at a steel plant here in Kansas City - some years after Bain Capital "acquired" it. The monopoly capitalists (a better name than "takeover specialists" for ripoff artists like Mitt Romney, after all) sucked profits out of the company, loaded it up with debt, then declared bankruptcy and shut it down. It's not "socialists" who give capitalism a bad name, is capitalists like Romney.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.